5 ms·
A couple of weeks ago I essentially failed the Turing test (took to be an AI). I found it a bit annoying, so I built Possibly Made By A Human. It tracks your ke
by juanre 3mo ago
A couple of weeks ago I essentially failed the Turing test (took to be an AI). I found it a bit annoying, so I built Possibly Made By A Human. It tracks your keyboard use (not the content, ms between keystrokes etc) and produces a signature for you. It can of course be spoofed, but that also takes some effort.
Actually made by a human, signature: https://possiblymadebyahuman.com/7PuEdZs1i1 https://possiblymadebyahuman.com/7PuEdZs1i1
- hathym 3mo agoa solution waiting for a chrome extension :)
- juanre 3mo agoI wrote it! I just haven't told anyone yet (nor tested it :-) This is a fun side-project, I don't have much time to play with it. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/possiblymadebyahuman/akodlnlfkdoiobdcghmbhhoafokmldoh?pli=1 https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/possiblymadebyahuma...
- smokedetector1 3mo agoThis is one of the coolest tech things I've seen in a while. Can you explain how the "Check a document" works? I'm not sure I understand how you would check if the timing aligns based only on the text content.
- juanre 3mo agoThanks! I had a lot of fun doing it. The signature includes a hash of the text, done at the browser so that the server does not have to see the content.
- smokedetector1 3mo agoAh, okay! Would you mind explaining what does "comparing wording, not exact text" mean?
- juanre 3mo agoIt's a very poorly written way of saying that instead of storing your text it uses a hash of your text to sign. When you want to check the signature you only need to hash the text to check, again without touching the server.
- smokedetector1 3mo agoI must agree that is quite poorly phrased