5 ms·
You can also argue the opposite, that due to her working with a particular interest in proving the organic industry wrong, she is finding factual information ab
by arecsu 3mo ago
You can also argue the opposite, that due to her working with a particular interest in proving the organic industry wrong, she is finding factual information about it. As usual, information should be dismissed or confirmed with more information, not with fallacies
- jraph 3mo agoOTOH this stuff has already been refuted and pesticide makers lobbying like this, spreading FUD on organic food, is a well known pattern already. We can't afford properly refuting each occurrence, the effort is highly asymmetrical.
- cyberax 3mo agoRefuted where? Be specific.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]