As mentioned, we also work on the Gitoxide project and Byron is a member of our team. We are well aware of all large community efforts and we're also cohosting

As mentioned, we also work on the Gitoxide project and Byron is a member of our team. We are well aware of all large community efforts and we're also cohosting the Git Merge conference this year. There is a recent effort to vibe-loop more Git into Gitoxide, which is interesting: https://github.com/GitoxideLabs/gitoxide/pull/2538 https://github.com/GitoxideLabs/gitoxide/pull/2538 I still think that this is a project that can have value with a little more work. This announcement is merely a milestone, not the end product. I wasn't sure it was really possible to do, even halfway through the project. There has been a lot learned and there is a lot to learn, but I think there are useful applications for both a high quality, hand crafted, opinionated partial Git library (Gix) as well as a vibed, fully implemented, partially sloppy LLM Git library (Grit). We think it's worth exploring and investing in both options for now. Also, I am the exec involved and I've done quite a lot for the Git community over the years. I would never try to have my "own copy" of it, that's ridiculous. I wrote and open sourced the Pro Git book (https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2 https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2) and Git community book before it (https://schacon.github.io/gitbook/index.html https://schacon.github.io/gitbook/index.html), I created the official Git website (https://git-scm.com https://git-scm.com), I cofounded GitHub which hosts nearly all open source in the world, I have evangelized and supported the Git ecosystem for almost 20 years now. I restarted and funded development of libgit2 15 years ago, which you could similarly argue was an exec trying to have our "own copy" of Git under a more permissive license and would have been a similarly ridiculous argument.