5 ms·
I saw someone on Xitter say "Any CEO who wants to replace jobs with AI should first have to replace their own assistant with AI" and I think that's the perfect
by habosa 3mo ago
I saw someone on Xitter say "Any CEO who wants to replace jobs with AI should first have to replace their own assistant with AI" and I think that's the perfect rule. Every AI demo is some version of a personal assistant, surely AI can do that job right?
I think we'd get zero volunteers from CEOs who have assistants.
(Note: this is not meant to be an insult to human assistants! I think they do a valuable job and should not be replaced by AI either).
- scubadude 3mo agoIt's the eating your own dog food. The Open AI guy said it's now better than doctors (he said it, not me lol). He's replaced his doctor, right?
- SpicyLemonZest 3mo agoWhat he said (https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/ai-may-beat-doctors-at-diagnosis-but-trust-still-wins-sam-altman/articleshow/122947295.cms?from=mdr https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelli...) is that he doesn't want AI to replace his doctor even if it is better at diagnosis. He wants both and he expects most people to agree.
- outime 3mo agoI don't think that's a fair comparison since LLMs can't e.g. prescribe medical tests or medication. That's not something I'd be looking for anyway, but we should at least compare apples to apples.
- zuzululu 3mo agoI donno CEOs get signals from multiple channels that cantbe accessed by AI or ordinary workers so that alone becomes a moat same with sales jobs theres a plane that AI cannot observe (yet)