> so I don’t even know at this point what the EU is trying to defend here. Says it right there: "Apple was simply unable to develop interoperability solutions

> so I don’t even know at this point what the EU is trying to defend here. Says it right there: "Apple was simply unable to develop interoperability solutions that meet essential EU privacy and security standards," Regnier said. "Instead of trying to find a suitable compliance solution, Apple simply made a request to the European Commission to be exempted from their interoperability obligations under the DMA - and this for at least 18 months. That's not an option."