8 ms·
The diagrams definitely look like LLM output as well
by _qua 3mo ago
The diagrams definitely look like LLM output as well
- M4v3R 3mo agoThe diagrams were generated with Nano Banana Pro (most probably, or alternatively with ChatGPT Image 2), if you look closely in high contrast areas you'll see artifacts in the background that give it away. I personally don't mind AI generated content when it's properly reviewed, but unfortunately more often than not the author just glances at the result and decides it's good enough. Example: https://opencv.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/image-1.jpeg https://opencv.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/image-1.jpeg I'm not knowledgable enough to determine whether this diagram is 100% accurate, but some things look off - the arrows in the bottom left seem superficial, some arrows are connected in weird ways, the mini diagram in AttentionLayer block doesn't look right (it has two Softmax icons and one MatMul icon, while the "before" diagram is the opposite).
- bl0b 3mo agoYeah that diagram is all over the place. The arrows on the left branching from the outline of the diagram itself?
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- saberience 3mo agoTested one of the diagrams: "Yes, the digital watermark indicates that most or all of this image was generated or edited using Google AI."
- KolmogorovComp 3mo agohow do you check?
- saberience 3mo agoJust go on Gemini and paste the photo into the chat and ask, it can use SynthID as a tool.