4 ms·
It is ... problematic ... to lead with "anti-AI" and then bury terms like "judicious in our use of it" in the fine print. IMO a team like yours can either: *
by jacques_chester 3mo ago
It is ... problematic ... to lead with "anti-AI" and then bury terms like "judicious in our use of it" in the fine print.
IMO a team like yours can either:
* Use LLMs, in which case you aren't "anti-AI".
* Not use LLMs currently, but the non-use is not due to following a principle, in which case you aren't "anti-AI".
* Not use LLMs and promise never to do so.
I'm happy you are trying something new. But you hurt yourself by engaging in something very old: disingenuity.
(edits for presentation and grammar)
- baepaul 3mo agoyeah this has been pointed out a few times, will revise the copytext later but will keep it up for the duration of the post. hope our sentiment is clearer in the comments that i've made, i think i've made the mistake of phrasing here with the "anti", i'll revisit it. edit: dang has removed it, apologies for the confusion i caused, that was my mistake.
- jacques_chester 3mo agoThanks, I appreciate it.
- dang 3mo agoI've taken that bit out of the title for the time being, since it was causing confusion.