18 ms·
> You're right to raise this Is this LLM generated?
by chomp 3mo ago
> You're right to raise this
Is this LLM generated?
- blitzar 3mo agoYou're right to raise this
- smithoc 3mo agoDoes it matter if it was? It's 2026. LLMs are integrated into text editors the same way as spell checkers and grammar checkers. Even if people write things themselves, they likely are using LLMs to review and edit. This isn't a bot pretending to be a human, this is an official announcement from a company. It's going to be written by a committee and edited by legal and PR and marketing anyway. Who cares if one (or several) of those steps used an LLM.
- chomp 3mo agoYes? Can’t take 10 minutes to speak (or at least redraft) with your own voice? I’ve written PR copy solo, and in committee. It’s not rocket surgery. It’s a group of people standing around with a thesaurus. But if you leave AI-isms in, just feels like you whipped it out while coffee was brewing.
- eightysixfour 3mo agoI'm still deciding how I feel about LLM generated text in situations like this. My struggle is that the content is what matters and complaining about use of an LLM is like complaining that someone didn't work hard enough. I'm not sure I value how hard they worked to craft it or the exact words, I value the content itself. This isn't true in something like fictional content, but...
- surgical_fire 3mo agoThis is valid construct in languages, and a very legitimate use of this construct in the context. If this was AI generated (which I am not convinced of given the full text), it escapes my alarm bells.
- Fire-Dragon-DoL 3mo agoPossibly reworded by llm. It would make sense for sensitive communication
- addandsubtract 3mo agoLazy enough to draft their response with LLMs, but not diligent enough to vett their sponsors with LLMs.
- O1111OOO 3mo ago>> You're right to raise this > Is this LLM generated? Thank you for noticing this and pointing it out. I don't use LLM often and would have missed it. How many hours a day do you spend actively using AI?