6 ms·

This is well known and documented. It should not be downvoted. Zionism in Big Tech is a huge issue. Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the P

This is well known and documented. It should not be downvoted. Zionism in Big Tech is a huge issue. Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Francesca Albanese documented this extensively in her report that got her sanctioned by the US. [0] TurboTax had IDF soldiers in uniform in their offices. [1] [0] https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ahrc5923-economy-occupation-economy-genocide-report-special-rapporteur https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ahrc5923-... [1] https://thegrayzone.com/2026/04/28/tech-giant-employees-idf-uniforms/ https://thegrayzone.com/2026/04/28/tech-giant-employees-idf-...

FunnyUsername 3mo ago
Presumably he's a reservist who was drafted after his country was invaded, and tried to attend a few work calls (although he should have been on paid leave) while drafted. What's the issue? Also one reservist is not "soldiers", and a video call is not "in their offices".
- bigyabai 3mo ago
  > What's the issue? You are literally commenting under an article titled "Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying" - it should be easy to determine the conflict of interest here. The Inslaw affair still gets discussed pretty often in security circles, as does Pegasus and FORCEDENTRY. Israel's spyware poses a threat only eclipsed by China, to most Americans.
stale2002 3mo ago
The vast majority of people in the USA do not want to destroy the state of Israel so I am not sure why you are making some conspiracy about (((zionists))) controlling big tech companies. Basically everyone in the US is a zionist. Especially once you point out that Israel has 200+ nuclear weapons and it would be a horrible idea to try and destroy them.
- beernet 3mo ago
  > Basically everyone in the US is a zionist. What? What kind of world view is that? Surely not a factual one. I have no view here other than what I hear from people and news. What stokes me is that people like you are really shocked and surprised when confronted with the truth.
  - stale2002 3mo ago
    Of course it's true. Israel has 200+ nuclear weapons. Most people aren't stupid enough to think that trying to destroy a country with 200+ nuclear weapons is a good idea. If they understand this simply idea, that makes them a zionist, almost by definition.
    - beernet 3mo ago
      This is total nonsense and you sound like a bot. A bad one at that. This is pathetic. Fear is not equivalent to zionism. In addition to that, Russia has many more nuclear weapons and is getting destroyed at this very moment.
      - stale2002 3mo ago
        > Fear is not equivalent to zionism. Saying that it's a bad idea to destroy Israel absolutely is Zionist. It's accepting that Israel will exist and attempts to destroy it should not be enacted. In this case, because of the nuclear war. > and is getting destroyed at this very moment. No they aren't. Russia isn't going to collapse as a country. Thats ridiculous. The worst case scenario for them is continued economic damage and a full withdrawal from Ukraine. But Moscow going under was never on the table, and yeah if it was actually truly threaten by an invading army, I'd absolutely expect nuclear weapons to be in the table. To apply the same thing to Israel, sure in some wild world that isn't the current universe, I could see them being pushed out of, like their current Lebanon areas and for the fighting to stop in Gaza, ect. And nuclear weapons aren't going to be used. But that's not the same as Jerusalem being threatened. Yes, if an invade army was taking over half the country, with boots on the ground, yes the nukes would fly. It arguably almost happened in fact, in one of the previous Arab wars. Nothing even close to that will happen any time soon though (because Israel isn't losing).

FunnyUsername 3mo ago

Presumably he's a reservist who was drafted after his country was invaded, and tried to attend a few work calls (although he should have been on paid leave) while drafted. What's the issue? Also one reservist is not "soldiers", and a video call is not "in their offices".

bigyabai 3mo ago
> What's the issue? You are literally commenting under an article titled "Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying" - it should be easy to determine the conflict of interest here. The Inslaw affair still gets discussed pretty often in security circles, as does Pegasus and FORCEDENTRY. Israel's spyware poses a threat only eclipsed by China, to most Americans.

stale2002 3mo ago

The vast majority of people in the USA do not want to destroy the state of Israel so I am not sure why you are making some conspiracy about (((zionists))) controlling big tech companies. Basically everyone in the US is a zionist. Especially once you point out that Israel has 200+ nuclear weapons and it would be a horrible idea to try and destroy them.

beernet 3mo ago
> Basically everyone in the US is a zionist. What? What kind of world view is that? Surely not a factual one. I have no view here other than what I hear from people and news. What stokes me is that people like you are really shocked and surprised when confronted with the truth.
- stale2002 3mo ago
  Of course it's true. Israel has 200+ nuclear weapons. Most people aren't stupid enough to think that trying to destroy a country with 200+ nuclear weapons is a good idea. If they understand this simply idea, that makes them a zionist, almost by definition.
  - beernet 3mo ago
    This is total nonsense and you sound like a bot. A bad one at that. This is pathetic. Fear is not equivalent to zionism. In addition to that, Russia has many more nuclear weapons and is getting destroyed at this very moment.
    - stale2002 3mo ago
      > Fear is not equivalent to zionism. Saying that it's a bad idea to destroy Israel absolutely is Zionist. It's accepting that Israel will exist and attempts to destroy it should not be enacted. In this case, because of the nuclear war. > and is getting destroyed at this very moment. No they aren't. Russia isn't going to collapse as a country. Thats ridiculous. The worst case scenario for them is continued economic damage and a full withdrawal from Ukraine. But Moscow going under was never on the table, and yeah if it was actually truly threaten by an invading army, I'd absolutely expect nuclear weapons to be in the table. To apply the same thing to Israel, sure in some wild world that isn't the current universe, I could see them being pushed out of, like their current Lebanon areas and for the fighting to stop in Gaza, ect. And nuclear weapons aren't going to be used. But that's not the same as Jerusalem being threatened. Yes, if an invade army was taking over half the country, with boots on the ground, yes the nukes would fly. It arguably almost happened in fact, in one of the previous Arab wars. Nothing even close to that will happen any time soon though (because Israel isn't losing).