6 ms·

I may be reading into this a bit more than needed, but, why the inclusion of the white anglo? Do you think the UK government would be more likely to let any ot

I may be reading into this a bit more than needed, but, why the inclusion of the white anglo? Do you think the UK government would be more likely to let any other ethnic origin UK citizen, be duped, imprisoned and not be bothered?

rmc 14y ago
That was more 'covering my ass', I'm sure there are examples of the UK handing some people over. The UK used to imprison without trial on UK soil some of it's UK citizens for terrorism crimes during it's recent civil war/unrest in Northern Ireland.
- martswite 14y ago
  Yes but the situation here isn't a handing over is it really? This isn't/won't be an extradition. If the US were to arrest him on arrival when they have pretty much inferred he has nothing to fear, that would be something else. I would hope regardless of ethnic origin that the UK government would do everything in its power to have the citizen released. I'm not really clued up on the Northern Ireland conflicts, I do however find the idea of locking people up without trial and keeping them detained for long periods of time, barbaric, regardless of what they are accused of.
  - rmc 14y ago
    I'm not really clued up on the Northern Ireland conflicts, I do however find the idea of locking people up without trial and keeping them detained for long periods of time, barbaric, regardless of what they are accused of. Things in Northern Ireland are much calmer now than they were (which is great!). There's still a lot more to do though. What's interesting is the things that didn't work but only made things worse. Interment without trial, made things worse, sending the army onto the streets made things worse. Car bombs by terrorists, or punishment shootings against 'informers', made things worse. This sort of violence makes things worse.
edent 14y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_detainees_at_Guantanamo_Bay http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_detainees_at_Guantanamo... You can argue whether they did enough to prevent the abuses of British citizens. They were all, eventually, released. But we don't know how hard the Government fought for them.

rmc 14y ago

That was more 'covering my ass', I'm sure there are examples of the UK handing some people over. The UK used to imprison without trial on UK soil some of it's UK citizens for terrorism crimes during it's recent civil war/unrest in Northern Ireland.

martswite 14y ago
Yes but the situation here isn't a handing over is it really? This isn't/won't be an extradition. If the US were to arrest him on arrival when they have pretty much inferred he has nothing to fear, that would be something else. I would hope regardless of ethnic origin that the UK government would do everything in its power to have the citizen released. I'm not really clued up on the Northern Ireland conflicts, I do however find the idea of locking people up without trial and keeping them detained for long periods of time, barbaric, regardless of what they are accused of.
- rmc 14y ago
  I'm not really clued up on the Northern Ireland conflicts, I do however find the idea of locking people up without trial and keeping them detained for long periods of time, barbaric, regardless of what they are accused of. Things in Northern Ireland are much calmer now than they were (which is great!). There's still a lot more to do though. What's interesting is the things that didn't work but only made things worse. Interment without trial, made things worse, sending the army onto the streets made things worse. Car bombs by terrorists, or punishment shootings against 'informers', made things worse. This sort of violence makes things worse.

edent 14y ago

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_detainees_at_Guantanamo_Bay http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_detainees_at_Guantanamo... You can argue whether they did enough to prevent the abuses of British citizens. They were all, eventually, released. But we don't know how hard the Government fought for them.