50 ms·
These models aren't products? They are open source ish (open weight I guess), research outputs. While the naming scheme may be confusing, it is relevant and imp
by ddarolfi 3mo ago
These models aren't products? They are open source ish (open weight I guess), research outputs. While the naming scheme may be confusing, it is relevant and important. I believe it's on you to understand it.
- refulgentis 3mo agoI understand it. :) And you're absolutely right to point out they aren't products - I hoped that was clear - when you're building a product with them, you end up having to do the same build loop 4 times, in this instance :)
- overfeed 3mo agoYou can stop after the first one. Choosing to repeat the process is on you, and probably because you see some benefit in using the variant(s) you build on top of.
- ddarolfi 3mo agoYes my framing was a little confusing. You were clear in that you are building products on them. I was more saying that because these gemma models are not products, and instead research outputs, the naming scheme should be more scientific rather than consumer friendly.
- sumedh 3mo ago> I believe it's on you to understand it. This is exactly why Google has 10 messenger Apps.
- nolist_policy 3mo agoGoogle released their latest messenger app 9 years ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chat