9 ms·
> which eats 1GB+ of RAM. Meanwhile, my editor only consumes 80MB of RAM And why are you comparing Claude Code to your editor? > They can't even improve Clau
by abletonlive 3mo ago
> which eats 1GB+ of RAM. Meanwhile, my editor only consumes 80MB of RAM
And why are you comparing Claude Code to your editor?
> They can't even improve Claude Code
That depends on how you define "improve". They've added a ton of features to it over time. Who said minimizing RAM usage was something they are prioritizing right now?
- wild_egg 3mo ago> why are you comparing Claude Code to your editor? Because the editor does more. All the compute-intensive parts of the agent are in the cloud. Zero reason for an agent harness to require anything beyond a potato to run.
- javascriptfan69 3mo agoDo you work for Anthropic or something? You seem weirdly invested in defending bad decisions. Even if you're and AI booster, shouldn't you want a better UI? They're a multi billion dollar company. Surely they can dedicate a small amount of their resources to improving UX?
- solid_fuel 3mo ago> And why are you comparing Claude Code to your editor? Because Claude Code is also used to - get this - EDIT CODE. It fills the same purpose as an editor, it just has extra hooks for their agentic garbage.