6 ms·
Just doing random evil things for no benefit? At this point it's just wanton vandalism. Punks in suits smashing windows and setting fire to cars. Can anyone he
by jimjimjim 4mo ago
Just doing random evil things for no benefit? At this point it's just wanton vandalism. Punks in suits smashing windows and setting fire to cars.
Can anyone here, hand of heart, say "I agree with this decision"?
- attheballot 4mo agoNone will. But hide them in a box, away from where others can see, and they will happily sign a piece of paper that says they do. One so called a ballot.
- andrewflnr 4mo agoThey probably think it's "cutting costs" or "reducing waste" or something. At least the fraction of the motive that isn't just corruption.
- MengerSponge 4mo agoRemember when North Carolina banned sea level rise? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/12/north-carolina-didnt-like-science-on-sea-levels-so-passed-a-law-against-it https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/12/north-caroli... That wasn't arbitrary, and it wasn't for no benefit. It was so that landowners along the coast could continue to use faulty sea level studies to justify state road and infrastructure investments. This, too, isn't mindless vandalism. It's worse. It's greedy, it's short-sighted, and it's cruel.
- conception 3mo agoYour premise here is i think incorrect. so I’m not claiming any links between nation state actors, and our current administration, but the nation of Russia plans to benefit greatly from climate change, and the opening of trade routes in the Arctic. Having control over Greenland directly or indirectly through intermediaries also benefits them to this end coincidentally. Having another country, also be the scapegoat for the cause of any negative consequences also greatly benefits them. If this is the light you shine on vents, everything seems to make a great deal of sense actually.