5 ms·
Kind of depends on the definition of no one. If the company puts an artificial proof of work demanding a rack of the latest data center GPUs, that should be il
by ashdnazg 4mo ago
Kind of depends on the definition of no one.
If the company puts an artificial proof of work demanding a rack of the latest data center GPUs, that should be illegal.
If the binary has the same hardware requirements that the company used when the service was up, I see it as totally fair.
- john_strinlai 4mo agotrue, but i think this would be exceptionally difficult (if not impossible) to enforce. ubisoft would surely be willing to spend an extra $500k on server hardware while developing a $25MM game, and subtlety bloat their server-side code so that they can say "this is the hardware we had to use to run it". there are a million ways to slow down code/increase hardware requirements that look plausible.