5 ms·

The EU's "E-Evidence framework" allows authorities in any member state to compel entities doing business in any part of the EU to produce and/or preserve commun

• traceroute66 4mo ago
  > Victor Orban could have wiretapped any communication within the EU. Supporter by an EU directive Don't spread such bullshit FUD. The E‑Evidence package contains multiple legal and procedural safeguards: 1. Judicial authorisation 2. Scope limits 3. Proportionality and necessity tests 4. Channels for challenge and review 5. Data-protection rules 6. Natinoal enforcements and remedies Cross-border orders must be issued as European Production Order (EPO) or European Preservation Order (EPO‑PR). The Regulation defines what can be optained and when. And wiretapping (i.e. content and traffic) is striclty limited to serious offences. Blanket mass surveillance is EXPLICITLY NOT POSSIBLE. A judge is required for sensitive categories, e.g. wiretapping. And factual grounds must be provided demonstrating necessity. The Regulation EXPLICITLY requires that orders be necessary and proportionate for criminal investigation The member state where the service provider (or its EU representative) is established is notified when an EPO/EPO‑PR is sent, giving an additional oversight channel and the enforcing authority a role in examining objections. The CJEU remains a backstop on top of national authorities.