6 ms·

This is slightly more tasteful slop than average (I'm thinking probably Claude rather than ChatGPT?), but it's still 100% AI written: https://www.pangram.com/hi

This is slightly more tasteful slop than average (I'm thinking probably Claude rather than ChatGPT?), but it's still 100% AI written: https://www.pangram.com/history/c55ab69b-e0a9-49a0-8056-2fcd7d305463 https://www.pangram.com/history/c55ab69b-e0a9-49a0-8056-2fcd...

0x3f 4mo ago
This... is not a reliable AI detection method at all.
- extr 4mo ago
  Pangram is highly reliable.
  - jemmyw 4mo ago
    It can't be that good, I gave it some posts I wrote before llms were a thing and it gave them all 60%+ of the content as written by AI.
    - extr 4mo ago
      ok thank you for this anecdote
      - jemmyw 4mo ago
        Not really an anecdote, strictly, just a single point of evidence.
- fallpeak 4mo ago
  You are incorrect. There, now we've both made unsupported assertions. Care to provide any evidence for your position? For what it's worth, when I provide a Pangram link it's because I can already tell something is AI and I'm attempting to provide objective third-party confirmation so the conversation doesn't just degrade into me asserting that I have superior taste to you.
arnon 4mo ago
sorry, but i wrote this myself