5 ms·
Preferably there would be more implementation. But if they only implement the "standard" language, it will be missing a lot of things. That is the point! It's n
by rootnod3 4mo ago
Preferably there would be more implementation. But if they only implement the "standard" language, it will be missing a lot of things. That is the point!
It's not Haskell anymore. It's Glasgow Haskell. It's its own language at this point.