4 ms·
in any corporate or half compliance-relevant setting switching isn't trivial. new DPA, subprocessor notifications, TIA, procurement review, security questionnai
by Clueed 4mo ago
in any corporate or half compliance-relevant setting switching isn't trivial. new DPA, subprocessor notifications, TIA, procurement review, security questionnaires, plus re-running your evals because prompts don't transfer 1:1. token cost is just one of the line items.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- lanthissa 4mo agono it really not, even the soggiest bank has multiple api vendors atm.
- alexandre_m 4mo agoI agree with parent. I'm not sure where your stance is coming from. From what I hear, most enterprise AI deployments are seat-based subscriptions with annual commitments.
- p1esk 4mo agoYes, I work at a 50 person startup and even here switching from CC to codex or cursor would be non-trivial for multiple reasons - not just the annual commitment.
- esperent 4mo agoI don't doubt you but it's amazing how much easier things get when there's another option at 20% of the price, and that's what's going to happen here if these American companies keep trying to squeeze the prices up.
- opsnooperfax 4mo ago50K FTE global firm. We’re still piloting ChatGPT. AI is a four-letter word and there are ridiculous ceremonies and hundreds of hours of overhead for every trivial use case. Amusingly, Enterprise credits are more expensive than just paying a zero-commitment on-demand API fee. Personal accounts are still the best value.
- lanthissa 4mo agomy stance is coming from working at one of the soggiest banks and having access to 3 with 2 more coming, and knowing the same is true at 2 of our large competitors.