5 ms·
Nobody should read that AI slop article. Nobody. Maybe there's an interesting story in there, it's certainly possible. But the "author" could not be bothered t
by plasticeagle 4mo ago
Nobody should read that AI slop article. Nobody.
Maybe there's an interesting story in there, it's certainly possible. But the "author" could not be bothered to write it, and so why should we waster our time reading it?
- usrnm 4mo agoI read it and found it interesting
- pjmlp 4mo agoI love people praise Claude for doing their work, every day on HN, while at the same time complaining about AI in articles.
- cenamus 4mo agoWho says these are the same people?
- pjmlp 4mo agoStatistics.
- bakugo 4mo agoGlad to see the classic goomba fallacy in action even here on HN.
- jjmarr 4mo agoI praise Claude and hate AI articles because I could've asked Claude to dumb down the debate if I wanted. Articles should be high information density and summarizable with Claude.
- pjmlp 4mo agoSome would argue code should be the product of craftsmanship and vibe coding has no place in it.
- sph 4mo agoI hate AI in code, I hate AI in articles, I hate when AI sticks to the bottom of my shoe.
- sucrosesucrose 4mo agoNo such case.
- plasticeagle 4mo agoI don't use AI at work either. Never will.
- chris_wot 4mo ago... because it makes some decent points?
- lenkite 4mo agoOverly wordy and repetitive - taking 3x the amount of words if a human had written it.