6 ms·
"allows the important stuff like LLMs writing code so long as you disclose." Are you sure? It says: "It's fine to use LLMs to answer questions, analyze, disti
by singularity2001 4mo ago
"allows the important stuff like LLMs writing code so long as you disclose."
Are you sure? It says:
"It's fine to use LLMs to answer questions, analyze, distill, refine, check, suggest, review. But not to *create*."
- staticassertion 4mo agoYes. The policy is pretty clear on what the rules are for LLM generated code. You need a reviewer to agree to review LLM generated code, you need to read the code yourself, etc.
- phire 4mo agoIt's a pretty strict ban, with an exception. That exception is experimental and somewhat limited; Only allows "well tested, high-quality" PRs on parts of the codebase that have a low probability of causing soundness issues, and it has a seperate review process with much higher standards. And it requires the reviewer to agree to the use of LLMs ahead of time, before the PR is opened. IMO, it has a high likelihood of degrading to a closed system, where some programmers with a good track record have little issue merging LLM generated PRs, while anyone without a reputation will struggle to even open an ai-assisted PR.