6 ms·
> even when the rust-lang/rust repository itself largely forbids vibe coding. This policy does not seem to forbid vibe coding?
by staticassertion 4mo ago
> even when the rust-lang/rust repository itself largely forbids vibe coding.
This policy does not seem to forbid vibe coding?
- dgellow 4mo agoI read it as a hypothetical
- lifthrasiir 4mo agoIt does in the narrower sense of vibe coding (as opposed to more general agentic coding, which is also called vibe coding from time to time...). > Solicited, non-critical, high-quality, well-tested, and well-reviewed code changes that are originally authored by an LLM are allowed, with disclosure. Vibe coding (in its original meaning) would have hard time arguing it's of high quality.
- staticassertion 4mo agoI guess that's the problem with the term. It should likely be left entirely out of a document like this since it's just confusing.