6 ms·

> The Claude Platform on AWS is a first of its kind offering for Anthropic, giving you all native Claude API features from day one. Anthropic operates the servi

> The Claude Platform on AWS is a first of its kind offering for Anthropic, giving you all native Claude API features from day one. Anthropic operates the service and data is processed outside the AWS boundary. So it's not... On AWS... ? This statement sounds.... Backwards? I get they have another option that is in AWS, but this continues the cryptic naming problem AWS already is overloaded with

tietjens 4mo ago
At this point I can only assume that AWS wants to have this naming issue. It’s an issue they have everywhere. Sagemaker is the worst offender. Only a solution architect can guide through such confusion…
- iLoveOncall 4mo ago
  As a long time Amazonian I can tell you it's simply because UX designers basically don't exist in Amazon (in case that wasn't obvious), and the ones that do exist are extremely bad at their job.
- falsemyrmidon 4mo ago
  [dead]
deleted 4mo ago
[deleted]
xyzzy123 4mo ago
I think the idea is that you can launder your team or product AI spend through your AWS account. This matters in Enterprise. It looks like the difference with Bedrock is that you access more "Claude platform" stuff than just the model. More charitably, this lets an org heavy on AWS use their existing IAM / SSO / Finops processes to manage Claude stuff, this is genuinely helpful when otherwise you have to go thru several teams and build out whole new rails to adopt.
- zmmmmm 4mo ago
  yes it sounds like a hack to get access to untracked spend in corporate accounts. In my org, I have to file a form for reimbursement if I bought a pencil for $0.25 but in AWS? spend varies by +/- $5k per month and nobody even questions it. This will definitely make it trivially easy for me to build on Anthropic's services without even telling anybody vs the hoops I would have to jump to get it paid for another way.
- wafflerewire 4mo ago
  This is my day job. I couldn't get access to the Claude Platform even with a business goal justification because of the management overhead while having Anthropic model access with Bedrock. Through AWS, assuming the underlying data governance is reasonable, this will be a much easier pill to swallow.
- stingraycharles 4mo ago
  > I think the idea is that you can launder your team or product AI spend through your AWS account. This is exactly it. For any reasonably sized org, setting up new contracts with new vendors involves a lot of procurement, lawyers, negotiations, etc. If a team can just click a button in AWS, there’s no issue. This is a product / solution that solves an organizational problem, not a technical one. I wouldn’t even call it a hack as much as extremely common a strategy.
  - pbgcp2026 4mo ago
    No, "This is exactly not it." They are buying your data on a cheap.
    - bdavbdav 4mo ago
      As someone who is dealing with the procurement of both in a medium sized it, finops and infosec are exactly it.
    - kube-system 4mo ago
      Do you have experience selling to fortune 100 sized organizations? “I don’t have the budget for this but we have AWS credits” is something teams beg for all the time. When people beg to give you money, you accept it. Why? It’s not some conspiracy theory. You accept the money because it’s money.
foolfoolz 4mo ago
there’s a top level feature in aws for investors to give out credits of like $120k of AWS spend during funding rounds. there’s min commits of spend for cheaper prices (RI). funneling costs and invoicing though aws has real benefits. aws spend monitoring is literally a sub industry with billion dollar players
- dilyevsky 4mo ago
  The credits you get from aws in their startup program are typically not spendable on marketplace. At least what we got through YC we could not spend there. Not sure how claude is integrating, maybe it’s different here
zmmmmm 4mo ago
Yeah i think this could backfire. At the moment they have such a clear messsage with Bedrock about data governance. You now have to ask a question and probalby get approval where previously there was no question and hence no barriers.
l5870uoo9y 4mo ago
> Claude on Amazon Bedrock keeps AWS as the data processor and operates within the AWS boundary. This is a good fit for companies that have strict regional data residency requirements or need their data processed exclusively within AWS's infrastructure. Seems like there are two different options.
- deleted 4mo ago
  [deleted]
KaiserPro 4mo ago
Yeah its a "marketplace private offer" As other people have pointed out, it makes contract signing much easier. THe other side effect is that it bumps up your spend, possibly to the point where you are eligible for "private pricing" ie global discount. So its a win-win for most people.
pacoWebConsult 4mo ago
Yeah, as someone with strict export compliance concerns which forces us to use Bedrock because its exclusively us-based inference in our AWS account, this does nothing for me. Frankly, nothing Anthropic has shipped over the past 6 months besides the models themselves has been useful to our company, despite running into the same problems they're trying to solve with all of those features (managed, remote agents). There's not really a good solution, as AgentCore runtime sucks and is expensive. You basically have to build this yourself because nobody is solving for self-hosted managed infra for agents, and we don't really have the time to build this sort of system on top of building our actual product. It's very frustrating for them to put this out as a win, when it doesn't help the people who are using AWS Bedrock to begin with.
- radial_symmetry 4mo ago
  Synthetiq offers self-hosted (local or in your cloud)

tietjens 4mo ago

At this point I can only assume that AWS wants to have this naming issue. It’s an issue they have everywhere. Sagemaker is the worst offender. Only a solution architect can guide through such confusion…

iLoveOncall 4mo ago
As a long time Amazonian I can tell you it's simply because UX designers basically don't exist in Amazon (in case that wasn't obvious), and the ones that do exist are extremely bad at their job.
falsemyrmidon 4mo ago
[dead]

deleted 4mo ago

[deleted]

xyzzy123 4mo ago

I think the idea is that you can launder your team or product AI spend through your AWS account. This matters in Enterprise. It looks like the difference with Bedrock is that you access more "Claude platform" stuff than just the model. More charitably, this lets an org heavy on AWS use their existing IAM / SSO / Finops processes to manage Claude stuff, this is genuinely helpful when otherwise you have to go thru several teams and build out whole new rails to adopt.

zmmmmm 4mo ago
yes it sounds like a hack to get access to untracked spend in corporate accounts. In my org, I have to file a form for reimbursement if I bought a pencil for $0.25 but in AWS? spend varies by +/- $5k per month and nobody even questions it. This will definitely make it trivially easy for me to build on Anthropic's services without even telling anybody vs the hoops I would have to jump to get it paid for another way.
wafflerewire 4mo ago
This is my day job. I couldn't get access to the Claude Platform even with a business goal justification because of the management overhead while having Anthropic model access with Bedrock. Through AWS, assuming the underlying data governance is reasonable, this will be a much easier pill to swallow.
stingraycharles 4mo ago
> I think the idea is that you can launder your team or product AI spend through your AWS account. This is exactly it. For any reasonably sized org, setting up new contracts with new vendors involves a lot of procurement, lawyers, negotiations, etc. If a team can just click a button in AWS, there’s no issue. This is a product / solution that solves an organizational problem, not a technical one. I wouldn’t even call it a hack as much as extremely common a strategy.
- pbgcp2026 4mo ago
  No, "This is exactly not it." They are buying your data on a cheap.
  - bdavbdav 4mo ago
    As someone who is dealing with the procurement of both in a medium sized it, finops and infosec are exactly it.
  - kube-system 4mo ago
    Do you have experience selling to fortune 100 sized organizations? “I don’t have the budget for this but we have AWS credits” is something teams beg for all the time. When people beg to give you money, you accept it. Why? It’s not some conspiracy theory. You accept the money because it’s money.

foolfoolz 4mo ago

there’s a top level feature in aws for investors to give out credits of like $120k of AWS spend during funding rounds. there’s min commits of spend for cheaper prices (RI). funneling costs and invoicing though aws has real benefits. aws spend monitoring is literally a sub industry with billion dollar players

dilyevsky 4mo ago
The credits you get from aws in their startup program are typically not spendable on marketplace. At least what we got through YC we could not spend there. Not sure how claude is integrating, maybe it’s different here

zmmmmm 4mo ago

Yeah i think this could backfire. At the moment they have such a clear messsage with Bedrock about data governance. You now have to ask a question and probalby get approval where previously there was no question and hence no barriers.

l5870uoo9y 4mo ago

> Claude on Amazon Bedrock keeps AWS as the data processor and operates within the AWS boundary. This is a good fit for companies that have strict regional data residency requirements or need their data processed exclusively within AWS's infrastructure. Seems like there are two different options.

deleted 4mo ago
[deleted]

KaiserPro 4mo ago

Yeah its a "marketplace private offer" As other people have pointed out, it makes contract signing much easier. THe other side effect is that it bumps up your spend, possibly to the point where you are eligible for "private pricing" ie global discount. So its a win-win for most people.

pacoWebConsult 4mo ago

Yeah, as someone with strict export compliance concerns which forces us to use Bedrock because its exclusively us-based inference in our AWS account, this does nothing for me. Frankly, nothing Anthropic has shipped over the past 6 months besides the models themselves has been useful to our company, despite running into the same problems they're trying to solve with all of those features (managed, remote agents). There's not really a good solution, as AgentCore runtime sucks and is expensive. You basically have to build this yourself because nobody is solving for self-hosted managed infra for agents, and we don't really have the time to build this sort of system on top of building our actual product. It's very frustrating for them to put this out as a win, when it doesn't help the people who are using AWS Bedrock to begin with.

radial_symmetry 4mo ago
Synthetiq offers self-hosted (local or in your cloud)