471 ms·

This is likely irrelevant given bun has stopped taking community PR's entirely and Jarred is pitching that human contributors should be banned.

etoxin 5mo ago
There is like 1,713 open PR's on the Bun repo. I'm assuming all are from Claude or robobun?. I guess this gives us an insight on what the claude-code workflow look likes. Crazy times.
- ModernMech 5mo ago
  https://lobste.rs/s/otxkjw/bun_js_runtime_is_being_vibe_ported_from#c_qfia71 https://lobste.rs/s/otxkjw/bun_js_runtime_is_being_vibe_port... > The regular pull requests for bun are wild too: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pulls?q=is%3Apr+ https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pulls?q=is%3Apr+ > Most are created autonomously by @robobun, checked for duplicates with a GitHub action (powered by Claude), reviewed by @coderabbitai and @claude. Meanwhile the CI is broken and @robobun finally closes a portion of its own PRs because they duplicate other PRs it has written. (Merging into main is still done by a human.)
jabedude 5mo ago
Where is a source for either of these extraordinary claims?
- csande17 5mo ago
  https://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2048434628248359284 https://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2048434628248359284
  - kelnos 5mo ago
    What a weird take. I do a ton of OSS, and the act of writing code is what makes it fun for me. If I were forced to use an LLM to write all my OSS code, I would just not do it anymore.
  - shadowfiend 5mo ago
    The gp's interpretation of that tweet is such a completely incorrect reading as to make one think it's likely disingenuous.
    - slopinthebag 5mo ago
      > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. How is it an incorrect interpretation? Jared is indeed pitching/suggesting/predicting that human contribution will not be allowed in the near future, i.e. banned.
      - Philpax 5mo ago
        A prediction is not a policy.
        sandbags 5mo ago
        When you use the word “allowed” it becomes a policy.
        NewsaHackO 5mo ago
        No, it doesn't.
        sandbags 4mo ago
        What would be required for you to see it as a policy?
      - kelnos 5mo ago
        "Pitching" generally means that the person making the pitch is endorsing and pushing for it. (This might also be a regional word meaning/usage difference type thing.) The person upthread should have said "predicting".
  - lioeters 5mo ago
    Wow, didn't realize how bad the situation was. Completely lost any respect and trust I had in the Bun project and its lead dev.
  - jdiaz97 5mo ago
    he clearly works for an LLM provider now
  - Imustaskforhelp 5mo ago
    Jesus christ, This is the thing which should be talked about more. What an abysmally bad take. This actually makes me worry about the faith of bun more than any other thing discussed here.

etoxin 5mo ago

There is like 1,713 open PR's on the Bun repo. I'm assuming all are from Claude or robobun?. I guess this gives us an insight on what the claude-code workflow look likes. Crazy times.

ModernMech 5mo ago
https://lobste.rs/s/otxkjw/bun_js_runtime_is_being_vibe_ported_from#c_qfia71 https://lobste.rs/s/otxkjw/bun_js_runtime_is_being_vibe_port... > The regular pull requests for bun are wild too: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pulls?q=is%3Apr+ https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pulls?q=is%3Apr+ > Most are created autonomously by @robobun, checked for duplicates with a GitHub action (powered by Claude), reviewed by @coderabbitai and @claude. Meanwhile the CI is broken and @robobun finally closes a portion of its own PRs because they duplicate other PRs it has written. (Merging into main is still done by a human.)

jabedude 5mo ago

Where is a source for either of these extraordinary claims?

csande17 5mo ago
https://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2048434628248359284 https://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2048434628248359284
- kelnos 5mo ago
  What a weird take. I do a ton of OSS, and the act of writing code is what makes it fun for me. If I were forced to use an LLM to write all my OSS code, I would just not do it anymore.
- shadowfiend 5mo ago
  The gp's interpretation of that tweet is such a completely incorrect reading as to make one think it's likely disingenuous.
  - slopinthebag 5mo ago
    > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. How is it an incorrect interpretation? Jared is indeed pitching/suggesting/predicting that human contribution will not be allowed in the near future, i.e. banned.
    - Philpax 5mo ago
      A prediction is not a policy.
      - sandbags 5mo ago
        When you use the word “allowed” it becomes a policy.
        NewsaHackO 5mo ago
        No, it doesn't.
        sandbags 4mo ago
        What would be required for you to see it as a policy?
    - kelnos 5mo ago
      "Pitching" generally means that the person making the pitch is endorsing and pushing for it. (This might also be a regional word meaning/usage difference type thing.) The person upthread should have said "predicting".
- lioeters 5mo ago
  Wow, didn't realize how bad the situation was. Completely lost any respect and trust I had in the Bun project and its lead dev.
- jdiaz97 5mo ago
  he clearly works for an LLM provider now
- Imustaskforhelp 5mo ago
  Jesus christ, This is the thing which should be talked about more. What an abysmally bad take. This actually makes me worry about the faith of bun more than any other thing discussed here.