8 ms·
Ownership is one question. IMO, a more interesting question is who is responsible when the code does some real-life damage.
by heikkilevanto 5mo ago
Ownership is one question. IMO, a more interesting question is who is responsible when the code does some real-life damage.
- ACCount37 5mo agoNo one. The usual.
- mock-possum 5mo agoWhy should it be any different than it ever was? If a release manager checked it but didn’t catch the vulnerability, they have some culpability. If the developer shipped the code without checking it, they have some culpability too. Ultimately, if they both work under an organization that they report to, they’re responsible to that organization, which is, in turn, accountable to its customers (and investors perhaps.) LLMs really change nothing about this.