6 ms·
That's what the paper's abstract says: >Crucially, this argument does not rely on biological exclusivity. If an artificial system were ever conscious, it would
by fat_cantor 5mo ago
That's what the paper's abstract says:
>Crucially, this argument does not rely on biological exclusivity. If an artificial system were ever conscious, it would be because of its specific physical constitution, never its syntactic architecture.
- subscribed 5mo agoYeah, this is why I wanted to understand what they were saying.