This is a rant based on scientific politics, and I am willing to bet there is more motivation here than the author is letting on. Its telling that the supposed

This is a rant based on scientific politics, and I am willing to bet there is more motivation here than the author is letting on. Its telling that the supposed 'intellectual property violation' is not something that Gould is even known for (look at the wikipedia page if you want to know what theories are associated with him). And in any case, presenting a scientific field as big as evolutionary biology as monolithic is either naive or intentionally exclusionary contradictory viewpoints.