6 ms·
This is a dangerous attitude. We don't need mass surveillance for traffic control. It can be done by the police if they really wanted to do it. Truth is, they
by MegagramEnjoyer 5mo ago
This is a dangerous attitude.
We don't need mass surveillance for traffic control. It can be done by the police if they really wanted to do it. Truth is, they don't care enough about road safety. This is about surveillance of citizens for control. First step is just infrastructure setup - next step is using it to prosecute those who dare to challenge the rise of fascism.
Be an advocate for your own rights to privacy. Don't simply accept it as normalcy.
- M3L0NM4N 5mo agoUnless you want a police officer on every street corner at all times, no, it cannot be "done by the police".
- MegagramEnjoyer 5mo agothen it doesn't need to be done in any way.
- M3L0NM4N 5mo agoI prefer people to be held accountable for their actions while driving, actually.
- MegagramEnjoyer 5mo agoLetting the state control our privacy is a huge price to pay for traffic management. Especially if said state is currently detaining people left and right, and occasionally murdering them
- M3L0NM4N 5mo agoI'm not concerned about "privacy" on public roads. If law enforcement illegally detaining and murdering people is a concern, I'd rather increase accountability for the law enforcement officers engaging in illegal activity, instead of removing their ability to police actual crime.
- MegagramEnjoyer 5mo agoJust stop. You are trying way too hard to act smart while spouting a bunch of bs that doesn't line up with reality
- M3L0NM4N 5mo agoThanks for the chuckle. I'm sorry you feel that way