5 ms·

Thanks. Yes, I would have to put myself in that category. Typical play here is to offer the self-hosted option. Not sure if that is in the pipeline for the crea

Thanks. Yes, I would have to put myself in that category. Typical play here is to offer the self-hosted option. Not sure if that is in the pipeline for the creators of this. Then you are into that trust/operational overhead tradeoff conversation.

mc-serious 5mo ago
[flagged]
- tjarjoura 5mo ago
  What do you anticipate to be the hardest part of supporting a self-hosted solution? I've worked a fair bit on converting SAAS -> self-hosted and always interested to hear others' pain points. I imagine a lot of the organizations that would find this most valuable, and would be willing to pay a lot, would be the same ones that would require something like this.
  - mc-serious 5mo ago
    [flagged]
    - trollbridge 5mo ago
      Currently we can use Bitwarden either hosted or self-hosted, which solves most of these problems (plus my own extra rig I built to generate OAuth tokens, for people which support that). Could you elaborate on what challenges you face that can't be solved by the Bitwarden approach?