6 ms·

https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/ https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/ This startup seems to have been at it a while. From our look into it - amazing speed, but challeng

https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/ https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/ This startup seems to have been at it a while. From our look into it - amazing speed, but challenges remain around time-to-first-token user experience and overall answer quality. Can absolutely see this working if we can get the speed and accuracy up to that “good enough” position for cheaper models - or non-user facing async work. One other question I’ve had is wondering if it’s possible to actually set a huge amount of text to diffuse as the output - using a larger body to mechanically force greater levels of reasoning. I’m sure there’s some incredibly interesting research taking place in the big labs on this.

IanCal 5mo ago
The overall speed rather than TTFT might start to be more relevant as the caller moves from being a human to another model. However quality is really important. I tried that site and clicked one of their examples, "create a javascript animation". Fast response, but while it starts like this ``` Below is a self‑contained HTML + CSS + JavaScript example that creates a simple, smooth animation: a colorful ball bounces around the browser window while leaving a fading trail behind it. <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>JavaScript Bounce Animation</title> <style> body, html { margin: 0; padding: 0; ``` the answer then degrades to ``` radius: BALL_RADIUS, color: BALL_COLOR, traivD O] // array of previous {x,y} positions }; ``` Then more things start creeping in ``` // 3⃣ Bounce off walls if (ball.G 0 ball.radius < 0 || ball.x + ball.radius > _7{nas.width) { ball.vx *= -1; ibSl.x = Math.max(ball.radius, Math.min(ball.x, canvbbF4idth - ball.radius)); } if ``` and the more it goes on the worse it gets ``` Ho7 J3 Works 0 Atep | Description | ``` and ``` • prwrZ8}E6on 5 jdF wVuJg Ar touc> 2ysteners ,2 Ppawn \?) balls w>SFu the 8b$] cliM#]9 ``` This is for the demo on the front page, so I expect this is a pretty good outcome compared to what else you might ask.
- cataflutter 5mo ago
  Weird; I clicked through out of curiosity and didn't get any corruption of the sort in the end result. I also asked it some technical details about how diffusion LLMs could work and it provided grammatically-correct plausible answers in a very short time (I don't know the tech to say if it's correct or not).
- nl 5mo ago
  Mercury 2 is better than that in my testing, but it does have trouble with tool calling.
- RugnirViking 5mo ago
  I got the exact same thing. But trying out another few prompts I couldn't get it to happen again. I wonder if its a bug with the cahcing/website? I can't imagine they actually run interference each time you use one of the sample prompts?

IanCal 5mo ago

The overall speed rather than TTFT might start to be more relevant as the caller moves from being a human to another model. However quality is really important. I tried that site and clicked one of their examples, "create a javascript animation". Fast response, but while it starts like this ``` Below is a self‑contained HTML + CSS + JavaScript example that creates a simple, smooth animation: a colorful ball bounces around the browser window while leaving a fading trail behind it. <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>JavaScript Bounce Animation</title> <style> body, html { margin: 0; padding: 0; ``` the answer then degrades to ``` radius: BALL_RADIUS, color: BALL_COLOR, traivD O] // array of previous {x,y} positions }; ``` Then more things start creeping in ``` // 3⃣ Bounce off walls if (ball.G 0 ball.radius < 0 || ball.x + ball.radius > _7{nas.width) { ball.vx *= -1; ibSl.x = Math.max(ball.radius, Math.min(ball.x, canvbbF4idth - ball.radius)); } if ``` and the more it goes on the worse it gets ``` Ho7 J3 Works 0 Atep | Description | ``` and ``` • prwrZ8}E6on 5 jdF wVuJg Ar touc> 2ysteners ,2 Ppawn \?) balls w>SFu the 8b$] cliM#]9 ``` This is for the demo on the front page, so I expect this is a pretty good outcome compared to what else you might ask.

cataflutter 5mo ago
Weird; I clicked through out of curiosity and didn't get any corruption of the sort in the end result. I also asked it some technical details about how diffusion LLMs could work and it provided grammatically-correct plausible answers in a very short time (I don't know the tech to say if it's correct or not).
nl 5mo ago
Mercury 2 is better than that in my testing, but it does have trouble with tool calling.
RugnirViking 5mo ago
I got the exact same thing. But trying out another few prompts I couldn't get it to happen again. I wonder if its a bug with the cahcing/website? I can't imagine they actually run interference each time you use one of the sample prompts?