5 ms·
I didn't say it was devoid of substance, the poll part is actually interesting (and worth discussing!) it's just that it actually appears *after* the sloppy twe
by belval 5mo ago
I didn't say it was devoid of substance, the poll part is actually interesting (and worth discussing!) it's just that it actually appears *after* the sloppy tweets and "someone pretended to shoot at Sam Altman's house" screenshot as if that was somehow relevant.
- JumpCrisscross 5mo agoThat might be rage porn. Whatever. Highlighting despicable people on Twitter gets clicks.
- NooneAtAll3 5mo ago"whatever" is exactly the "bad reporting" complaint GP is making
- JumpCrisscross 5mo agoFair enough. It would be better if they interviewed actual people. Barring that, the tweets add colour to the data.