5 ms·

Sorry, but this analogy is very misleading, no one browses websites through Google's servers. For example, right now in my URL bar I read "news.ycombinator.com

by fiatjaf 5mo ago

Sorry, but this analogy is very misleading, no one browses websites through Google's servers. For example, right now in my URL bar I read "news.ycombinator.com", not "google.com/profile/news.ycombinator.com". If Google goes down now I can keep browsing this website and all the other websites I have in all my other tabs as if nothing had happened.

danabramov 5mo ago
Does Google Reader help you make sense of it? It’s more like each app is like its own Google Reader. And indeed you were able to access the same posts via other apps at that time of outage.
evbogue 5mo ago
Do you have ideas about how Bluesky could decentralize?
- wmf 5mo ago
  Not the original poster but I do have some ideas. Official Bluesky clients could randomly/round-robin access 3-4 different appview servers run by different organizations instead of one centralized server. Likewise there could be 3-4 relays instead of one. Upgrades could roll across the servers so they don't all get hit by bugs immediately.
  - evbogue 5mo ago
    If multiple personal data servers (pdses) share the same set of posts how would we guarantee that they are tamper resistant to third parties?
    - wmf 5mo ago
      PDSes should be sharded not replicated. Your posts live on your PDS which lives in one place (although it can move).
      - evbogue 5mo ago
        What's stopping us from doing both?
        wmf 5mo ago
        Cost and complexity tradeoffs. IMO the relay/appview is the current bottleneck.
        evbogue 5mo ago
        This is why I'm hoping fiatjaf has a recommendation here. I have a feeling he might have a proposal that solves this. But doesn't solve all of it, just some of it.
pfraze 5mo ago
Technically you can still view the posts directly from the PDS. It’s just uninteresting compared to web pages
_heimdall 5mo ago
> no one browses websites through Google's servers. Didn't Google's AMP project do exactly that?

by fiatjaf 5mo ago

danabramov 5mo ago

Does Google Reader help you make sense of it? It’s more like each app is like its own Google Reader. And indeed you were able to access the same posts via other apps at that time of outage.

evbogue 5mo ago

Do you have ideas about how Bluesky could decentralize?

wmf 5mo ago
Not the original poster but I do have some ideas. Official Bluesky clients could randomly/round-robin access 3-4 different appview servers run by different organizations instead of one centralized server. Likewise there could be 3-4 relays instead of one. Upgrades could roll across the servers so they don't all get hit by bugs immediately.
- evbogue 5mo ago
  If multiple personal data servers (pdses) share the same set of posts how would we guarantee that they are tamper resistant to third parties?
  - wmf 5mo ago
    PDSes should be sharded not replicated. Your posts live on your PDS which lives in one place (although it can move).
    - evbogue 5mo ago
      What's stopping us from doing both?
      - wmf 5mo ago
        Cost and complexity tradeoffs. IMO the relay/appview is the current bottleneck.
        evbogue 5mo ago
        This is why I'm hoping fiatjaf has a recommendation here. I have a feeling he might have a proposal that solves this. But doesn't solve all of it, just some of it.

pfraze 5mo ago

Technically you can still view the posts directly from the PDS. It’s just uninteresting compared to web pages

_heimdall 5mo ago

> no one browses websites through Google's servers. Didn't Google's AMP project do exactly that?