7 ms·

The second half of this article is detected as AI by pangram: https://www.pangram.com/history/63fdecd4-f932-4fad-af60-da9928ea1d33 https://www.pangram.com/histo

by ad8e 5mo ago

The second half of this article is detected as AI by pangram: https://www.pangram.com/history/63fdecd4-f932-4fad-af60-da9928ea1d33 https://www.pangram.com/history/63fdecd4-f932-4fad-af60-da99...

eterm 5mo ago
Ai detectors are bullshit. That said, the second paragraph has the distinctive stocatto tone of AI But AI is shaping how we write, so this could well all be hand written just by someone who spends time with AI output.
- pityJuke 5mo ago
  AI is also based on how we write. Some people are bound to write in a similar vein to LLMs naturally. See this person’s blog about it [0]. [0]: https://marcusolang.substack.com/p/im-kenyan-i-dont-write-like-chatgpt https://marcusolang.substack.com/p/im-kenyan-i-dont-write-li...
- toyg 5mo ago
  > stocatto Staccato, which is Italian for "detached, separated". When I see simple Italian words used as technical terms in music or art, I think "oh, this must be what English speakers feel when they work in tech - a lot of common words becoming specific concepts in that particular field".
  - biofaust 5mo ago
    Also, he is dangerously close to "stocazzo", which is similar to a very offensive way to say "fuck no!".
  - eterm 5mo ago
    Thanks for the correction, I felt I hadn't got the word quite right.
dgb23 5mo ago
The article felt honest and personal to me.
noio 5mo ago
I might have to reexamine my attitudes: the entire article felt AI-written to me, which instantly reduced my appetite for reading it. Which is unfair of course. A) I don’t even know whether it was actually was written by AI and B) even if it was, it still encapsulates a human’s potentially worthwhile thoughts and experiences. But.. undeniably genAI will lead to a much greater volume of text being written so we’ll all have to be even more selective in what we read and what not?
bonoboTP 5mo ago
I don't need an AI detector to see I dislike the AI-like style of the article, the bombastic extra-hype American-style self-brand LinkedIn-lingo.
tasuki 5mo ago
So what? Detecting whether content was produced by AI is impossible. Please stop shilling tools promising the impossible. The mentioned 99.98% accuracy is complete bullshit.

by ad8e 5mo ago

The second half of this article is detected as AI by pangram: https://www.pangram.com/history/63fdecd4-f932-4fad-af60-da9928ea1d33 https://www.pangram.com/history/63fdecd4-f932-4fad-af60-da99...

eterm 5mo ago

Ai detectors are bullshit. That said, the second paragraph has the distinctive stocatto tone of AI But AI is shaping how we write, so this could well all be hand written just by someone who spends time with AI output.

pityJuke 5mo ago
AI is also based on how we write. Some people are bound to write in a similar vein to LLMs naturally. See this person’s blog about it [0]. [0]: https://marcusolang.substack.com/p/im-kenyan-i-dont-write-like-chatgpt https://marcusolang.substack.com/p/im-kenyan-i-dont-write-li...
toyg 5mo ago
> stocatto Staccato, which is Italian for "detached, separated". When I see simple Italian words used as technical terms in music or art, I think "oh, this must be what English speakers feel when they work in tech - a lot of common words becoming specific concepts in that particular field".
- biofaust 5mo ago
  Also, he is dangerously close to "stocazzo", which is similar to a very offensive way to say "fuck no!".
- eterm 5mo ago
  Thanks for the correction, I felt I hadn't got the word quite right.

dgb23 5mo ago

The article felt honest and personal to me.

noio 5mo ago

I might have to reexamine my attitudes: the entire article felt AI-written to me, which instantly reduced my appetite for reading it. Which is unfair of course. A) I don’t even know whether it was actually was written by AI and B) even if it was, it still encapsulates a human’s potentially worthwhile thoughts and experiences. But.. undeniably genAI will lead to a much greater volume of text being written so we’ll all have to be even more selective in what we read and what not?

bonoboTP 5mo ago

I don't need an AI detector to see I dislike the AI-like style of the article, the bombastic extra-hype American-style self-brand LinkedIn-lingo.

tasuki 5mo ago

So what? Detecting whether content was produced by AI is impossible. Please stop shilling tools promising the impossible. The mentioned 99.98% accuracy is complete bullshit.