15 ms·
Actually, it is more human, because there are humans involved at each level. Doesn't matter if you think the music sucks, it's definitionally more human than AI
by w00ds 6mo ago
Actually, it is more human, because there are humans involved at each level. Doesn't matter if you think the music sucks, it's definitionally more human than AI music.
- SoftTalker 6mo agoIt is sort of a blend now. Beats and rhythm tracks are often generated. Vocals are auto-tuned. There's still some humanity in it, but it's not what it used to be.
- userbinator 6mo agoAI music is generated from the result of training on far more human-made music than any human could ever consume in their lifetime, so there are even more humans involved in its creation.
- BoiledCabbage 6mo agoJust like AI comments are more human than any human could ever produce... /s
- userbinator 6mo agoThere's a difference between entertainment and thoughtful content.
- throwawa34214 6mo agoMusic also is thoughtful content.
- yellowapple 6mo agoI mean, maybe in the sense that any other corporate activity is technically “human activity” because humans happened to be the ones doing the formula-dictated tasks, but it's ultimately the formula at the helm, not the human.
- lxgr 6mo agoOn the other hand, humans made these AI models... I feel like the more important distinction might be whether the creator(s) are expressing themselves or are solving an optimization problem of maximizing audience approval. The latter seems true for both some human and AI pop songs. One is a form of communication that requires (at least to some extent) meeting both sides to meet in the middle, the other is unidirectional broadcasting.