7 ms·
> Every single one of them oversells their capacity That sounds like their problem, not ours
by peterkelly 6mo ago
> Every single one of them oversells their capacity
That sounds like their problem, not ours
- HotHotLava 6mo agoWell, yes, it is. That's why you're seeing them take proactive steps to address the problem, like this new policy.
- seqizz 6mo agoDoesn't look like it
- Tzk 6mo agoIn theory yes, but the overselling does also keep the price low (at least a bit), but also boosts revenue. So when power users use the service too much, the seller will either raise prices, cut features or ban some usage patterns. You can vote with your wallet though. So don’t throw money at them or just deal with it. Plain and simple.
- ajsnigrutin 6mo agoLow for who exactly? You have low-users overpaying and a few openclaw users actually using what they paid for and getting banned for that... that's not really a "low price" for anyone. If they they expect X money for Y tokens, better provide Y tokens for your X money. If they can't provide that, then change the pricing plans. That's not the users problem.
- frollogaston 6mo agoWho exactly, their intended audience. I get my money's worth having Claude Code write code. No interest in OpenClaw.
- raincole 6mo agoIt's not your problem anymore once you switch from Claude :)
- adammarples 6mo agoIt's not a problem at all, you get subsidised to use it