I already can't remember jq syntax. Naming this jg just means I'll type one, instinctively use the other's syntax, and get an error anyway. It's a DX trap. But

I already can't remember jq syntax. Naming this jg just means I'll type one, instinctively use the other's syntax, and get an error anyway. It's a DX trap. But I will admit, the new syntax makes a lot more sense.