5 ms·
No, the bar owner has a right know who's in his bar. The local or federal government do not have the right, or need to know the whereabouts of the average law
by dekken_ 6mo ago
No, the bar owner has a right know who's in his bar.
The local or federal government do not have the right, or need to know the whereabouts of the average law abiding citizen. There is no "free" information, all information has a cost, whether it be acquisition or storage. Currently the people are taxed to oppress themselves. There is no choice not to be taxed, there is no consent.
- Propelloni 6mo ago[flagged]
- dekken_ 6mo agoYou don't understand consent, lots of people don't vote. And even if they do, they don't automatically consent to all actions performed in their name.
- devin 6mo agoWhat an incredibly misinformed comment. You need to educate yourself. What you wrote is downright anti-American.
- ashtonshears 6mo agoSilence demon!
- mothballed 6mo agoUSA has worldwide, actually interplanetary taxation of its citizens. You are within the bounds of 'tax-enforcing' no matter where you go.
- JumpCrisscross 6mo agoYou've said shat I meant to say more eloquently. That's my point. The bar owner can possess the information about their own bar without problem. The issue is when they share it with others, voluntarily or under coercion.
- dekken_ 6mo agoNo you still don't get it, the bar owner can share the information with whoever he likes. The government, does not own the country, it's not "their bar".
- JumpCrisscross 6mo ago> The government, does not own the country, it's not "their bar" Never mentioned the government. If I shop at a store and the store owner starts selling my information to everyone under the sun, I'm going to keep an eye out for alternatives. I don't mind them collating it. I do when they share it.