> Just like you (at the moment) are acting like you don't care if people die in fires. There is nothing in my comment that could possibly be interpreted as mea

> Just like you (at the moment) are acting like you don't care if people die in fires. There is nothing in my comment that could possibly be interpreted as meaning I don't care about people dying in fires. > If you want to replace FF there is exactly one solution, that's nuclear. We're talking about batteries, so I'm not sure how this is relevant unless you want reactors in cars? > Stop acting like you care about this issue. You have never cared enough to learn about it, so until you do, stop spreading misinformation about how physics works. I made a single, sourced, claim in my comment and didn't mention physics once? > Too bad there isn't enough Li for everyone to have one. Could this be why companies are looking at alternatives? Either way, this claim really should be provided with a source.