Okay at my core I'm an inductionist. However this article is a mere tautology at best. The article doesn't explain why. It explains a bunch of cases and works

Okay at my core I'm an inductionist. However this article is a mere tautology at best. The article doesn't explain why. It explains a bunch of cases and works backwards to show that the original premise was true. This sounds fine but the end of the article specifically mentioned that this is dangerous because the world doesn't always work like this. This is the problem with induction, it might work in 99% of cases, I've never seen a Black Swan so there must not be any black swans? Deduction has more value when it comes to math specifically... I'll admit that as an inductionist.