6 ms·
It’s an unethical, false choice. The reviewers are not perfectly rational agents that do free work, they have real needs and desires. Shame on ICML for exploiti
by quinndupont 6mo ago
It’s an unethical, false choice. The reviewers are not perfectly rational agents that do free work, they have real needs and desires. Shame on ICML for exploiting their desperation.
- jojomodding 6mo agoIs it? The reviewers could simply have chosen a different option in a form field. While I understand that they were "forced" to review under reciprocal review, they still had other choices where I don't see coercion happening and that could have avoided the outcome for them.
- qbit42 6mo agoBanned for life is a stretch but the actual response is completely fine. They can just resubmit to the next conference. Words mean something, if you promise to uphold a contract and break it, there are consequences. The reviewers were free to select the policy which allows LLM use.
- mikkupikku 6mo ago[flagged]