7 ms·
Exactly. As slave as them.
by MrPapz 6mo ago
Exactly. As slave as them.
- tylerchilds 6mo agoNot an apt metaphor because we can just walk away and never see our employers again if that’s our free will.
- memonkey 6mo agoI know we're getting deep in the meta discussion but the free will that you're describing involves basically starving to death. Sure, you can walk away but unless you're well off, we all basically live in the same society that makes sure you are ALWAYS dependent on some kind of wage. You cannot live off the land, build housing, or eat food without some kind of income in the modern world. And thus the concept of wage slave.
- bit-anarchist 6mo agoBut wage slavery, while bad, isn't slavery still. In slavery proper, the option of walking away straight up doesn't exist. In fact, in extreme cases, even the option of dying might not be available.
- skinnymuch 6mo agoIt is slavery. Chattel slavery is much more severe than what we normally consider slavery. Yet “slavery” and chattel slavery are both still slavery. The reason what you’re saying is so accepted is because we are currently living under a universal liberal world order that says wage slavery id freedom.
- bit-anarchist 6mo agoI hope you notice I didn't mention chattel slavery. Even prior to it, all forms of slavery were about removing the agency of person and subjugating the will of the slave to the owner. That requires an active action. Not hiring someone is a passive action. As said by many, you are not entitled to a wage. In fact, suggesting otherwise would actually require slavery. Wage slavery, instead, is a description of a particular material condition of destitution, not necessarily connected to the ethical evaluation to proper slavery. No one says "wage slavery is freedom". What the "universal liberal world", that is, the pro-free market side says is that people should be free to associate with each other as they see fit. Being hired to provide labor in exchange for wage, the basis for wage work, is merely an extension of this. While wage work is a requirement for wage slavery, at no point economic liberals said that everyone should live under wage slavery conditions.
- lencastre 6mo agoneeds moar meta… cause it‘s a bitter sweet symphony that‘s life…
- skinnymuch 6mo ago“destitution” I am not referring to this. I was referring to the political/economic meaning of the word. Not about not making a lot.
- bit-anarchist 6mo agoThe common, orthodixical, sociological/economical meaning of the word "wage slavery" is about being paid, on average, barely enough to make a living, i.e. destitution in the conventional sense. I suppose you are referring to the Marxist meaning, technically (at least as far as I know) original, meaning. First, Marxist economics are considered heterodoxical nowadays. Second, it is still about "destitution", in the sense that the working class is formally destitute of the means of production, requiring to sell their labor to have access to it. If that's the case, I hope you notice that weakens your point of "wage slavery being a form of slavery", as you lose the analogy of proper material conditions.
- baggy_trough 6mo agoAccording to the dictionary, you are wrong. Somebody who works for a wage is not the property of their employer.
- skinnymuch 6mo agoWage slavery doesn’t literally only refer to wages. I was referring to the political meaning. Not something you can go to the dictionary for.
- baggy_trough 6mo agoYou said “it is slavery”; it is not slavery.
- renewiltord 6mo ago[flagged]
- wahnfrieden 6mo agoYou’ll lose your health insurance
- tt24 6mo agoSounds like having a w2 is a pretty good deal for you then. Slavery isn’t defined by “I don’t want to talk away because the deal is too good”, it’s more like “I’m unable to walk away because I’m threatened with force if I do so”
- wahnfrieden 6mo agoI moved to Canada instead of tying myself to a w2
- renewiltord 6mo agoThis is one of those reasons I never took slave rebellions seriously. Instead of dying like that in the dirt why not just move to Canada?
- tt24 6mo agoGuess you were never a slave then.
- wahnfrieden 6mo agoI didn’t call myself that
- tt24 6mo agoContext of the thread is important
- wahnfrieden 6mo agoI agree
- 6mo ago