6 ms·
Is this unavoidable? I mean it does generate clicks and views and user engagement so if one platform is doing it, doesn't that automatically mean that the other
by hmate9 6mo ago
Is this unavoidable? I mean it does generate clicks and views and user engagement so if one platform is doing it, doesn't that automatically mean that the other has to do it? Otherwise they will continuously lose market share.
- hmate9 6mo agoI think the burden to curate your feed so that you do not have such content is now resting with the user and they cannot rely on the platform to do it for them.
- pocksuppet 6mo agoIf the user even wants to do that. Why would they? They're looking for a sugar rush, they're not looking to eat their intellectual vegetables. How do you get children to eat vegetables?
- brookst 6mo ago"They" being others, but definitely not you right? Those people...
- mvid 6mo agoThis assumes the platforms either allow such curation or respect it, which instagram and TikTok famously don’t
- LtWorf 6mo agoExcept there's no way to do this on those platforms.
- thaumasiotes 6mo ago> I mean it does generate clicks and views and user engagement so if one platform is doing it, doesn't that automatically mean that the other has to do it? Otherwise they will continuously lose market share. Why? User engagement isn't the same thing as market share. If McDonald's trained its cashiers to insult you while taking your order, engagement would go up, and market share would go down.