> Both are classified as civilians Then say civilians. Don't claim what you can't provide. And DO provide context (like, was it still while the massacre was on

> Both are classified as civilians Then say civilians. Don't claim what you can't provide. And DO provide context (like, was it still while the massacre was ongoing [1]). But all I can do is to suggest. > Good job cherry-picking Me cherry-picking: Taking the literally first entries, Array[0] and Array[1]. Also, you can't claim cherry-picking as invalid against gish-gallop. Since you can't enjoy the size argument only to retract items on the list after the smallest pushback. Otherwise I can prove God. How? Every sentence in the Bible... Oh, you found some that are wrong? "Good job cherry-picking"! And not to mention dozens of more problems with the list (no mentioning any IDF comments, no source for titles, etc.). This is just a bad list. Simple as. > ICC is clearly investigating Investigating != Judgment. But good, send them more. But please send them a list starting with items that might hold the smallest of scrutinies. And don't prove it by hinting at conspiracies just because Israel has a security censor. But all I can do is to suggest. [1]: https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/ https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/