17 ms·

How does one say that a media worker is fair game, but a journalist is not? Both are classified as civilians under international law [1]. There are several air

by b345 6mo ago

How does one say that a media worker is fair game, but a journalist is not? Both are classified as civilians under international law [1]. There are several airstrikes as the method of execution of these journalists as well. Good job cherry-picking the "favourable" examples. Also, I don't know what you're on about, but ICC is clearyly investigating Israeli war crimes of targeted journalist executions [3]. [1]: https://cpj.org/2023/10/journalist-casualties-in-the-israel-gaza-conflict/ https://cpj.org/2023/10/journalist-casualties-in-the-israel-... [2]: https://cpj.org/data-methodology/ https://cpj.org/data-methodology/ [3]: https://ifex.org/iccs-israel-palestine-investigation-will-include-crimes-against-journalists/#:~:text=In%20its%20statement%2C%20the%20ICC,are%20of%20crucial%20importance%20in https://ifex.org/iccs-israel-palestine-investigation-will-in...

yonixw 6mo ago
> Both are classified as civilians Then say civilians. Don't claim what you can't provide. And DO provide context (like, was it still while the massacre was ongoing [1]). But all I can do is to suggest. > Good job cherry-picking Me cherry-picking: Taking the literally first entries, Array[0] and Array[1]. Also, you can't claim cherry-picking as invalid against gish-gallop. Since you can't enjoy the size argument only to retract items on the list after the smallest pushback. Otherwise I can prove God. How? Every sentence in the Bible... Oh, you found some that are wrong? "Good job cherry-picking"! And not to mention dozens of more problems with the list (no mentioning any IDF comments, no source for titles, etc.). This is just a bad list. Simple as. > ICC is clearly investigating Investigating != Judgment. But good, send them more. But please send them a list starting with items that might hold the smallest of scrutinies. And don't prove it by hinting at conspiracies just because Israel has a security censor. But all I can do is to suggest. [1]: https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/ https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/

by b345 6mo ago

yonixw 6mo ago

> Both are classified as civilians Then say civilians. Don't claim what you can't provide. And DO provide context (like, was it still while the massacre was ongoing [1]). But all I can do is to suggest. > Good job cherry-picking Me cherry-picking: Taking the literally first entries, Array[0] and Array[1]. Also, you can't claim cherry-picking as invalid against gish-gallop. Since you can't enjoy the size argument only to retract items on the list after the smallest pushback. Otherwise I can prove God. How? Every sentence in the Bible... Oh, you found some that are wrong? "Good job cherry-picking"! And not to mention dozens of more problems with the list (no mentioning any IDF comments, no source for titles, etc.). This is just a bad list. Simple as. > ICC is clearly investigating Investigating != Judgment. But good, send them more. But please send them a list starting with items that might hold the smallest of scrutinies. And don't prove it by hinting at conspiracies just because Israel has a security censor. But all I can do is to suggest. [1]: https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/ https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/