5 ms·
Wouldn't a hash work great for this purpose? I.e. 1. User requests for email alice@example.com to be removed from database 2. Company removes "alice@example.c
by abound 6mo ago
Wouldn't a hash work great for this purpose? I.e.
1. User requests for email alice@example.com to be removed from database
2. Company removes "alice@example.com" from 'emails' table
3. Company adds 00b7d3...eff98f to 'do_not_send' table
Later on, the company buys emails from some other third-party, and Alice's email is on that list. The company can hash all the email addresses they received, and remove the emails with hashes that appear in their 'do_not_send' table.
You'd have to normalize the emails (and salt the hashes), but seems doable?
- wildzzz 6mo agoSo in the end, they have a list of emails that match the hashes in their blacklist? What's the point?
- fc417fc802 6mo agoAny entry that matches a hash needs to be deleted. The point is presumably to minimize the retention of PII.
- dotancohen 6mo agoNo need to salt individual hashes, just one hard coded salt for all.