5 ms·
Vite+ Alpha: Unified Toolchain for the Web (MIT License)
- zenon_paradox 6mo ago[dead]
- osener 6mo agoThis announcement mentions Node.js a couple of times. Does it also support Bun as a package manager and a runtime?
- ameliaquining 6mo agoNo. There's an open issue: https://github.com/voidzero-dev/vite-plus/issues/557 https://github.com/voidzero-dev/vite-plus/issues/557
- ramon156 6mo ago> vp install: Install dependencies with automatic package manager detection And it doesn't even support one of the bigger PM's? Weird
- orra 6mo agoOh! This is cool. When they announced it 5 months ago it looked interesting, but it wasn't open source. Discussion at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45537035 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45537035 With this being open sourced, and being the integration and creation of several fast components, this becomes an obvious recommendation for JS/TS. Similar to Cargo for Rust and uv for Python, yes?
- jadbox 6mo agoWhat's the difference then between Void and Vite+
- rk06 6mo agovite+ is a cli tool and open source, which is built on top of vite. void is a deployment platform and sdk which is built on top of cloudflare and vite. void will be paid offerring
- robpalmer 6mo agoCongrats, all. The web has always needed a simpler tooling story, not just an easier one. And the credentials for this attempt are far more favourable than previous attempts. Glad to see Vite+ is now MIT licensed. That will immensely help with adoption. The Void.cloud/Cloudflare tie-in is very reasonable for deployment workflows and associated runtime APIs. I think I've heard that everything else in the Vite+ scope (build/test/check/run, etc) will be decoupled (i.e. plugin-based and agnostic of runtimes/hosting providers) which sounds like an important ongoing principle.