7 ms·
If you're at a place that rewards complexity, you might be able to pitch simplicity as something that to get right, requires deep understanding of complex infor
by BenoitEssiambre 7mo ago
If you're at a place that rewards complexity, you might be able to pitch simplicity as something that to get right, requires deep understanding of complex information theoretic concepts and deep understanding of ontological knowledge about the domain (it helps that this is true https://benoitessiambre.com/simple.html https://benoitessiambre.com/simple.html ). You can talk about the Bayesian Occam's Razor ( https://benoitessiambre.com/abstract.html https://benoitessiambre.com/abstract.html ) and about minimizing the entropy of code ( https://benoitessiambre.com/entropy.html https://benoitessiambre.com/entropy.html ), of tests ( https://benoitessiambre.com/integration.html https://benoitessiambre.com/integration.html ) and even of infrastructure ( https://benoitessiambre.com/pgcentrism.html https://benoitessiambre.com/pgcentrism.html ).