6 ms·
> In defense of Deutsche Bahn, countries with comparable infrastructure but more reliable transport have put in about twice as much money per capita for the las
by CaptainZapp 7mo ago
> In defense of Deutsche Bahn, countries with comparable infrastructure but more reliable transport have put in about twice as much money per capita for the last 30 years at least.
Why is that "in defense?"
When you let your infrastructure rot away since the 90s of the last century for something as complex as a train network by brutally underinvesting.
Then you seriously fucked up. There's nothing to defend here.
- sveme 7mo agoI think the defense is that it's the fault of the politicians (CDU/CSU, actually), as they are the ones allocating funds towards train infrastructure. The Deutsche Bahn is state-owned in all but name (which was one of the major fuckups of the last red-green government).
- okanat 7mo agoWell people keep electing CxU. The current structure of DB is formed by Helmut Kohl cabinet which is CxU.
- meetpaleltech 7mo ago[flagged]
- okanat 7mo ago"We elected right-wing parties who are against sane wages and unions and often use/exploit immigrants to depress wages while funneling billions into companies and away from infrastructure projects. So we decided to elect an even more right-wing party to blame immigrants while doing even more funneling away. It will definitely solve all the infrastructure problems that those penniless brown people and weird speaking ones caused."
- moresty 7mo ago> Why is that "in defense?" Because DB does not decide its own budget. And we're literally living in times where their employees are getting attacked and verbally abused by the passengers for the state of the train system
- rsynnott 7mo agoInvestment isn't really down to DB, though; it's down to the government.
- hermanzegerman 7mo agoBecause stupid people that vote blame the company and not the politicians that underinvest for years