6 ms·
well how did it do?
by odvcencio 7mo ago
well how did it do?
- wocram 7mo agoShouldn't you be able to answer that?
- odvcencio 7mo agoyes and if you clicked the links you would know that i did answer it in the readme.
- do_not_redeem 7mo ago> Pure-Go tree-sitter runtime — no CGo, no C toolchain, WASM-ready. No you didn't. The readme is obvious LLM slop. Em-dash, rule of three, "not x, y". Why should anyone spend effort reading something you couldn't be bothered to write? Why did you post it to HN from a burner account?
- mathfailure 7mo agoBut how do we know the readme isn't also vibecoded?
- ctmnt 7mo agoI read the README and did not find answers to my questions.
- ctmnt 7mo agoHard to say. Claude’s very good at writing READMEs. In fact, Copilot often complains about docs that sound like they’re about current capabilities when in fact they’re future plans or just plan aspirational. Without downloading and testing out your software, how can we know if it’s any good? Why would we do that if it’s obviously vibed? The dilemma. I’m not at all against vibe coding. I’m just pointing out that having a nice README is trivial. And the burden of proof is on you.