>Yes, but that would be a CL violation Let's be brave and deviate from the standard, preferably in a backward-compatible way, to provide the best achievable DX

>Yes, but that would be a CL violation Let's be brave and deviate from the standard, preferably in a backward-compatible way, to provide the best achievable DX. The CL committee, however smart it was, could not think through all the nooks and crannies of the system. Let's continue where they left off and progress.