6 ms·
> many countries are increasing funding substantially (e.g. [1]). This illustrates exactly my point. Canada is planning on spending up to CAD$1.7B over 12 year
by ProjectArcturis 7mo ago
> many countries are increasing funding substantially (e.g. [1]).
This illustrates exactly my point. Canada is planning on spending up to CAD$1.7B over 12 years. That is equivalent to USD$100M per year, or 0.3% of the NIH 2026 budget. Maybe if Europe does something similar they can get to 2%!
> The US is also no longer safe
I agree that Trump's regime has made the US a less welcoming place for foreign scientists, and that budget cuts mean less research will be done. What I disagree with is the idea that "brain drain" is a significant threat to US science. We simply have such an incredible oversupply of biomed PhDs that we should welcome the prospect of other countries absorbing the supply.
- layer8 7mo agoHorizon Europe is a €93.5 billion budget over seven years for scientific research. The EU allocated an additional €500 million from 2025-2027 to attract foreign researchers specifically.
- ProjectArcturis 7mo agoHorizon Europe funds everything — physics, engineering, social sciences, climate, agriculture, digital technology, space, and health. And its budget is still less than 1/3rd of the US NIH budget focused solely on health.
- shiroiuma 7mo agoMaybe, but money goes much farther in Europe than in the US. The cost of living is much lower, so you don't need to pay people so much.
- ProjectArcturis 7mo agoLow European salaries are other reason why brain drain fears are overblown.